Send this article to Promobot

From the publisher: Nome fuel struggle highlights need for more icebreakers in Alaska

December 9th 1:21 am | Jason Evans Print this article   Email this article   Create a Shortlink for this article

As many of you may have heard, in addition to owning and publishing the Arctic Sounder, I am chairman of my village corporation of Nome, Sitnasuak Native Corporation. Sitnasuak's fuel business has been waiting for its final fuel barge to arrive in Nome for three months. Our corporation was notified just over a week ago that our fall fuel barge carrying 1.6 million gallons of home heating fuel, diesel and gasoline would not be arriving in Nome at all.

Not receiving our fuel meant that the community of Nome would run out of fuel some- timeinthespring. Theonlyprovenmethodof delivering fuel in the winter in western Alaska is to have fuel flown into Nome one airplane load at a time, possibly taking hundreds of flights 24 hours a day as aircraft capable of hauling the fuel become available. This meth- od would cost millions of dollars more than the fuel barge.

I assembled our team and we began researching all available options. We began contacting air carriers capable of fuel transport. Knowing that this would cost millions, we wondered if it was possible to still make an ocean delivery of fuel. The answer quickly became, "Yes that it is possible, but there are very limited options and almost none in the U.S."

One by one, we looked at what was possible for winter frozen ocean fuel delivery. Cook Inlet ice breaking tugs, Canadian tugs and barges, Norwegian ice breaking ships, and Russian ships. Anything close was committed and unavailable. Others were too far and on the other side of the world. But the Russian ships were close, capable and possibly available.

The few civilian ice breakers located in the U.S. are in the Great Lakes. There are three U.S. Coast Guard ice breakers, which are home ported in Seattle, and two of them are out of commission undergoing repairs. The third is the USC Healy, currently sitting off the coast of Nome in the Bering Sea, conducting research, but its draft is too deep to get within 1 mile of Nome's shore. The USC Healy is also not designed to carry fuel beyond what is carried for its use. And yet the place where ice breakers are needed to be permanently based, the Arctic in Alaska, has none. This really shows how behind the United States is when it comes to ice breakers.

"We're missing the boat while other nations are expanding their icebreaker fleet," Lieutenant Governor Mead Treadwell said to a House Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.

Lieutenant Governor Treadwell also told the associated press that the Russians plan to build nine more ice breakers.

With increased shipping through the Arctic, new oil and gas development in Alaska waters, and emergencies like what is happening in Nome, there is more of a need now than ever before in our history for new ice breaking ships capable of reaching the shores of our communi- ties. The availability of these ships will ensure the health and safety not only of our communi- ties but also of our oceans, the animals and everything connected to them.

 

Contact us about this article at editor@thearcticsounder.com

Copyright 2012 The Arctic Sounder is a publication of Alaska Media, LLC. This article is © 2012 and limited reproduction rights for personal use are granted for this printing only. This article, in any form, may not be further reproduced without written permission of the publisher and owner, including duplication for not-for-profit purposes. Portions of this article may belong to other agencies; those sections are reproduced here with permission and Alaska Media, LLC makes no provisions for further distribution.